Whales sometimes come ashore and are stranded. There have been incidents in which there was a relationship between the time and location of beaked whale strandings and the use of multiple, mid-frequency sonars in nearshore areas. Why these whales stranded is not understood . Additional research is needed to increase our knowledge of ocean noise and how marine mammals respond to it.
The term stranding refers to an aquatic animal, especially a marine mammal, landing on a beach or in shallow water, dead or sometimes alive, and probably in distress. Observations as far back as Aristotle and illustrations from the Middle Ages show us that marine mammals have been stranding for millennia.
In the U.S. alone, about 1,000 cetaceans and 2,500 pinnipeds strand annually. Some animals strand live and are returned to sea. Others die at sea or on shore. Animals may strand singly or in groups. When 3 or more animals strand together in time and place, it is called a mass stranding. Some species, such as pilot whales, mass strand fairly often. Whether strandings are single or mass, strandings are a concern for conservationists and biologists. Determining the cause of a stranding or death of a stranded animal is difficult. Scientists must reconstruct what happened, but have little or no information about the animal’s history or the circumstances that preceded the stranding. On average, a cause of death can be determined in only about half of all stranding cases.
One controversial and unresolved issue is how the use of military sonar relates to strandings, particularly strandings of some species of beaked whales. Mass strandings of beaked whales are rare; a review of all beaked whale strandings from 1874 to 2004 found only 136 mass stranding events. This study ranked each stranding by the quantity and quality of data available in order to determine whether a correlation existed between use of naval sonar and the strandings. They found only 12 stranding events for which there was evidence that naval activity and a stranding coincided in space and time. These events had three consistent features: (1) the stranding locations were less than 80 km from the 1,000-m depth contour (that is, where deep water occurs near shore); (2) 8 out of the 12 stranding events occurred in areas where beaked whale mass strandings had previously been reported; and (3) all 12 events included Cuvier’s beaked whales (Ziphius cavirostris), a species that does not commonly mass strand. Another analysis examining the correlation between sonar use and beaked whale mass strandings found that strandings were correlated with naval activity in the Mediterranean and Caribbean seas, but not off the coasts of Japan, the eastern United States, and southern California. This suggests that there are locations with certain characteristics that may contribute to stranding events.
A number of explanations have been proposed for the observed injuries in the animals that stranded in the areas of sonar exercises. These tentative explanations, called hypotheses need to be tested through experiments and checked for consistency in any further observations in order to determine whether they are correct.
One hypothesis that has been proposed to explain the internal hemorrhaging that was observed in the Bahamas stranding is that tissue damage can occur when resonance from loud sounds causes air- or fluid-filled organs (such as the lungs or swim bladder) to vibrate at very large amplitudes. As the organs vibrate, blood vessels and tissues of the organs might become damaged. NOAA held a workshop in 2003 to discuss resonance in cetaceans (for more information see PDF Report of the Workshop on Acoustic Resonance as a Source of Tissue Trauma in Cetaceans). The workshop concluded that acoustic resonance was not likely the cause of the injuries in the Bahamas stranding for several reasons. One reason was that the mid-frequency (1-10 kHz) sonars did not operate at the lung’s resonant frequencies.
A hypothesis that has been proposed to explain the gas bubbles and tissue damage observed in the stranding in the Canary Islands is that they were consistent with decompression sickness. The scientists suggested that beaked whales might have changed their diving pattern in response to the sounds and come to the sea surface faster than normal, causing bubbles to form in the tissues. This hypothesis is still being debated and more research is needed to develop conclusive answers. The gas bubbles and tissue damage that have been observed could have resulted from many causes, some that are not related to sound. A recent report has found degeneration in the bones of sperm whales specimens obtained over the last 111 years. The scientists hypothesize that the degeneration is due to bubble formation associated with decompression sickness that is unrelated to sound. These hypotheses about decompression sickness, bubble growth, and degeneration in the bones of sperm whales have not been tested, and they should not be used as scientifically accepted explanations until they are. They are basically ideas that scientists are now testing and may or may not be correct.
Another hypothesis to explain the cause of the tissue damage is that sound causes bubbles to form or grow in tissues that are supersaturated with nitrogen. One way this could happen is through a process called rectified diffusion. In this hypothesis, sounds cause small bubbles that normally exist in the blood and tissues to grow larger. It is unlikely that this process caused the tissue damage observed in the Bahamas stranding because the sound exposures were too short. However, if sound caused bubbles to form or grow, they would continue to grow by static diffusion as long as the tissues remained supersaturated, which could resulting in tissue damage. Whether or not this hypothesis is plausible for marine mammals is still being debated.
Much more scientific research is needed to understand why there is a relationship in time and location between the beaked whale strandings and the use of multiple, mid-frequency sonars in nearshore areas. At present, it is uncertain whether stranding events are limited to beaked whales and near shore areas. Science is an evolving process and future work may help us further understand what we are observing.
- Crum, L. A., Bailey, M. R., Guan, J., Hilmo, P. R., Kargl, S. G., Matula, T. J. and Sapozhnikov, O. A. 2005, “Monitoring bubble growth in supersaturated blood and tissue ex vivo and the relevance to marine mammal bioeffects.” Acoustics Research Letters Online 6(3): 214-220.
- Crum, L.A., and Mao, Y. 1996, “Acoustically enhanced bubble growth at low frequencies and its implications for human diver and marine mammal safety.” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 99(5): 2898-2907.
- D’Amico, A., and Verboom, W. eds. 1998, “Summary Record and Report, SACLANTCEN Bioacoustics Panel, La Spezia, Italy, 15-17 June 1998.” SACLANT Undersea Research Centre.
- Evans, D.L., and England, G.R. 2001, “Joint Interim Report Bahamas Marine Mammal Stranding Event 15-16 March 2000.” Department of the Navy and Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Washington, D.C. (source)
- Fernández, A., Arbelo, M., Deaville, R., Patterson, I.A.P., Castro, P., Baker, J.R., Degollada, E., Ross, H.M., Herráez, P., Pocknell, A.M., Rodríguez, E., Howie, F.E., Espinosa, A., Reid, R.J., Jaber, J.R., Martin, V., Cunningham, A.A. and Jepson, P.D. 2004, “Pathology: Whales, sonar and decompression sickness (reply)” Nature 428(15 Apr 2004)
- Fernandez, A., Edwards, J. F., Rodriguez, F., Espinosa de los Monteros, A., Herraez, P., Castro, P., Jaber, J. R., Martin, V. and Arbelo, M. 2005, “‘Gas and fat embolic syndrome’ involving a mass stranding of beaked whales (Family Ziphiidae) exposed to anthropogenic sonar signals.” Veterinary Pathology 42: 446-457.
- Finneran, J.J. 2003, “Whole-lung resonance in a bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus) and white whale (Delphinapterus leucas)” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 114(1): 529-535.
- Frantzis, A. 1998, “Does acoustic testing strand whales.” Nature 392(6671): 29.
- Houser, D.S., Howard, R. and Ridgway, S. 2001, “Can diving-induced tissue nitrogen supersaturation increase the chance of acoustically driven bubble growth in marine mammals.” Journal of Theoretical Biology 213(2): 183-195.
- Jepson, P.D., Arbelo, M., Deaville, R., Patterson, I.A.P., Castro, P., Baker, J.R., Degollada, E., Ross, H.M., Herraez, P., Pocknell, A.M., Rodriguez, F., Howie, F.E., Espinosa, A., Reid, R.J., Jaber, J.R., Martin, V., Cunningham, A.A. and Fernandez, A. 2003, “Gas-bubble lesions in stranded cetaceans.” Nature 425(6958): 575-576.
- Moore, M.J. and Early, G.A. 2004, “Cumulative sperm whale bone damage and the bends.” Science 306 (24 December 2004): 2215.
- National Marine Fisheries Service. 2000, “Annual Report to Congress: 1999-2000 Administration of the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972.” National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Marine Fisheries Service (NOAA Fisheries), Silver Spring, Maryland. 105 pp. (Retrieved from http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/pdfs/laws/mmpa_annual_1999-2000.pdf in 2017 – possibly available at the Wayback Machine)
- National Research Council. 2003, “Ocean Noise and Marine Mammals.” The National Academies Press, Washington, D.C.
- Piantadosi, C.A. and Thalmann, E.D. 2004, “Pathology: Whales, sonar and decompression sickness.” Nature 428(15 Apr 2004)