Traditional sonar-based systems, such as side-scan sonar and echosounders, operate at long ranges and great depths, but they do not have sufficient resolution to provide the detail required for some applications. Optical imaging systems are effective over short distances where there is sufficient light and clarity. Acoustic cameras use acoustic lenses and a high-frequency transducer array to focus sound energy and produce fast-frame, video-like imagery. They operate at higher frequencies and shorter ranges than conventional sonar systems. Acoustic camera lenses transmit multiple, parallel, narrow beams and receive the return signals. This system generates sharper images than conventional sonars, but the higher frequencies required limit their effective range.

Current-day acoustic camera technologies evolved from medical ultrasound devices developed in the 1960s as well as port surveillance systems developed in the 1990’s. Modern cameras can be configured for operations with remotely operated vehicles (ROVs), autonomous underwater vehicles (AUVs), or human divers. The Limpet Mine Imaging Sonar (LIMIS) is an efficient method used by U.S. Navy divers to check for mines or improvised explosive devices (IED) on ship hulls and piers.

One acoustic camera, the Dual-Frequency Identification Sonar (DIDSON), has a greater range than LIMIS and was originally developed to effectively identify underwater intruders detected by harbor surveillance systems. It has two operating modes: detection mode and identification mode. In detection mode, the DIDSON transmits 48 beams in one working cycle with a frequency of 1.1 MHz and detection range up to 40 m. In identification mode, it can transmit 96 beams in one working cycle with a frequency of 1.8 MHz and a detection range up to 12 m. Acoustic cameras are also used to inspect structures such as bridge pilings and oil pipelines, to detect debris and aquatic plants and animals that could clog cooling water intakes at power plants, in fisheries management, and research.

Dual-frequency Identification Sonar (DIDSON) imagery of adult Pacific salmonids near the entrain to a saltwater fish drain at the Hiram M. Chittenden Locks, Seattle, WA. (Courtesy of Johnson Fisheries Science, www.johnsonfishsci.com)

Acoustic cameras require less training than traditional sonar systems and their video-like footage is easier to interpret. This enables observations of swimming behavior, directional movements, animal size, and species identification. Data can be used to determine migration timing and spawning behavior and conduct fish counts. It is possible to use acoustic camera outputs for species identification for fish with unique body shapes, fin positions, or characteristic swimming behavior (e.g. eels). However, for other fishes, it can be challenging to identify to species, as a clear image of fish shape is required, but not always produced. Shadows produced when fish move through the acoustic beam can also cause false detections and higher automated counts.

Underwater acoustic camera imagery of a large shark and its acoustic shadow seen off the Dry Tortugas (Florida, USA). Video credit: Sound Metrics (http://www.soundmetrics.com).

Acoustic cameras are used also for other research applications. Systems have been deployed to count and measure animals in the deep sea scattering layers and to characterize deep ocean prey. DIDSON cameras have captured near-continuous data for shark species that transit an important habitat boundary at Palmyra Atoll in the Pacific. Acoustic cameras have also been used to investigate the depredation behavior of harbor seals around salmon setnets.

 

Additional Links on DOSITS

References

  • Belcher, E. O., Lynn, D. C., Dinh, H. Q., & Laughlin, T. J. (1999). Beamforming and imaging with acoustic lenses in small, high-frequency sonars. Oceans ’99. MTS/IEEE. Riding the Crest into the 21st Century. Conference and Exhibition. Conference Proceedings (IEEE Cat. No.99CH37008), 3, 1495–1499. https://doi.org/10.1109/OCEANS.1999.800215.
  • Belcher, E. O., Barone, J. R., Gallagher, D. G., & Honaker, R. E. (2003). Acoustic Lens Camera and Underwater Display Combine to Provide Efficient and Effective Hull and Berth Inspections. MTS Proceedings, Oceans ’03 Conference, 8. San Diego, CA./
  • Doehring, K., Young, R., Hay, J., & Quarterman, A. (2011). Suitability of Dual-frequency Identification Sonar (DIDSON) to monitor juvenile fish movement at floodgates. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research, 45(3), 413–422. https://doi.org/10.1080/00288330.2011.571701.
  • Egg, L., Pander, J., Mueller, M., & Geist, J. (2018). Comparison of sonar-, camera- and net-based methods in detecting riverine fish-movement patterns. Marine and Freshwater Research, 69(12), 1905. https://doi.org/10.1071/MF18068.
  • Fujimori, Y., Ochi, Y., Yamasaki, S., Ito, R., Kobayashi, Y., Yamamoto, J., … Sakurai, Y. (2018). Optical and acoustic camera observations of the behavior of the Kuril harbor seal Phoca vitulina stejnegeri after invading a salmon setnet. Fisheries Science, 84(6), 953–961. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12562-018-1236-z.
  • Giorli, G., & Au, W. W. L. (2017). Combining passive acoustics and imaging sonar techniques to study sperm whalesforaging strategies. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 142(3), 1428–1431. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.5002895.
  • Giorli, G., & Au, W. W. L. (2017). Application of dual frequency identification sonar for the study of deep diving odontocetes prey fields. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 141(6), EL605–EL609. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4989740.
  • Giorli, G., Drazen, J. C., Neuheimer, A. B., Copeland, A., & Au, W. W. L. (2018). Deep sea animal density and size estimated using a Dual-frequency IDentification SONar (DIDSON) offshore the island of Hawaii. Progress in Oceanography, 160, 155–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2018.01.002.
  • Kamgar-Parsi, B., Rosenblum, L. J., & Belcher, E. O. (1998). Underwater imaging with a moving acoustic lens. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 7(1), 91–99. https://doi.org/10.1109/83.650853.
  • Kocak, D. M., Dalgleish, F. R., Caimi, F. M., & Schechner, Y. Y. (2008). A focus on recent developments and trends in underwater imaging. Marine Technology Society Journal, 42(1), 52–67. https://doi.org/10.4031/002533208786861209.
  • Langkau, M. C., Balk, H., Schmidt, M. B., & Borcherding, J. (2012). Can acoustic shadows identify fish species? A novel application of imaging sonar data: ACOUSTIC SHADOWS FOR FISH SPECIES DISCRIMINATION. Fisheries Management and Ecology, 19(4), 313–322. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2400.2011.00843.x.
  • Lin, D.-Q., Zhang, H., Kang, M., & Wei, Q.-W. (2016). Measuring fish length and assessing behaviour in a high-biodiversity reach of the Upper Yangtze River using an acoustic camera and echosounder. Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 32(6), 1072–1079. https://doi.org/10.1111/jai.13134.
  • Martignac, F., Daroux, A., Bagliniere, J.-L., Ombredane, D., & Guillard, J. (2015). The use of acoustic cameras in shallow waters: new hydroacoustic tools for monitoring migratory fish population. A review of DIDSON technology. Fish and Fisheries, 16(3), 486–510. https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12071.
  • Maxwell, S. L., & Gove, N. E. (2007). Assessing a dual-frequency identification sonars’ fish-counting accuracy, precision, and turbid river range capability. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 122(6), 3364–3377. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2799500.
  • McCauley, D. J., DeSalles, P. A., Young, H. S., Gardner, J. P. A., & Micheli, F. (2016). Use of high-resolution acoustic cameras to study reef shark behavioral ecology. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 482, 128–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2016.04.012.
  • Moursund, R. (2003). A fisheries application of a dual-frequency identification sonar acoustic camera. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 60(3), 678–683. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1054-3139(03)00036-5.
  • Mueller, R. P., Brown, R. S., Hop, H., & Moulton, L. (2006). Video and acoustic camera techniques for studying fish under ice: a review and comparison. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, 16(2), 213–226. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11160-006-9011-0.
  • Smyth, C. N., Poynton, F. Y., & Sayers, J. F. (1963). The ultra-sound image camera. Proceedings of the Institution of Electrical Engineers, 110(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.1049/piee.1963.0003.
  • Trucco, A., Palmese, M., Fusiello, A., & Murino, V. (2002). Three-dimensional underwater acoustical imaging and processing. In R. S. H. Istepanian & M. Stojanovic (Eds.), Underwater Acoustic Digital Signal Processing and Communication Systems (pp. 247–274). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3617-5_8.

Additional Resources

  • Pipal, K., Jessop, M., Boughton, D., & Adams, P. (2010). Using dual-frequency identification sonar (DIDSON) to estimate adult steelhead escapement in the San Lorenzo river, California (Vol. 96).